Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
SWATT, III v. LYDALL THERMAL/ACOUSTICAL, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00606
Plaintiff:
Joseph Swatt and JOSEPH J. SWATT, III
Defendant:
LYDALL THERMAL/ACOUSTICAL, INC., Scott G Bathrick, LYDALL THERMAL/ACOUSTICAL, INC. doing business as ALKEGEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MORRELL et al v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv62649
Defendant:
SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORPORATION, INC., CAREY CANADA, OWENS-ILLIINOIS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
REED & GREENWOOD INSULATION CO., EASTERN REFRACTORIES, JOYCE MORRELL and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
EASTERN REFRACTORIES CO. INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMAS et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv62654
Plaintiff:
GEORGE THOMAS and NOREEN THOMAS
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. , PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
NEW ENGLAND INSULATION CO. , CUMMINGS INSULATION CO., INC. , D&N INSULATION CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LYDALL THERMAL V FEDERAL-MOGUL
as 09-1135
Defendant-Appellee:
Federal-Mogul Corporation and Federal-Mogul Powertrain, Inc.
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Lydall Thermal/Acoustical Sales, LLC, Lydall Thermal/Acoustical, Inc. and Lydall, Inc.
Lydall Thermal/Acoustical, Incorporated v. Lydall Thermal/Acoustical Sales, LLC et al
as 2:2007cv12473
Plaintiff:
Lydall Thermal/Acoustical, Incorporated, Lydall Thermal/Acoustical, Incorporated, Lydall Thermal/Acoustical Sales, LLC and others
Defendant:
Federal-Mogul Corporation and Federal-Mogul Powertrain, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
