Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. GTD Medical and Rehabilitation Center, Inc. et al
as 9:2026cv81026
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Co., Geico Indemnity Co., GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
GTD Medical and Rehabilitation Center, Inc., Kesnel Theus, Saintlouitane Theus and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kirk CampbellIn re: Kirk Campbell
as 26-12536
Petitioner:
In re: KIRK CAMPBELL
Respondent:
J.M. CELESTE, A. SHICK, ENNIS and others
General Insurance Company of America v. Theus
as 3:2026cv01133
Plaintiff:
General Insurance Company Of Amercia
Defendant:
John Theus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
In re: Kirk Campbell
as 26-12499
Petitioner:
In re: KIRK CAMPBELL
Respondent:
J.M. CELESTE, A. SHICK, ENNIS and others
Theus v. Rushing et al
as 3:2026cv02530
Plaintiff:
Calvin Theus
Defendant:
Nolen Bass, Antonio Johnson and Robert Rushing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Kirk Campbell
as 26-12464
Petitioner:
In re: KIRK CAMPBELL
Respondent:
J.M. CELESTE, A. SHICK, ENNIS and others
Ebone Maxwell et al v. Lavender Lingerie, LLC et al
as 2:2026cv06670
Plaintiff:
Ebonie Maxwell, Jessica Gonzalez, Yentle Potts and others
Defendant:
Lavender Lingerie, LLC, Savage X, Inc., Savage X GC, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Campbell v. J.M. et al
as 1:2026cv02349
Plaintiff:
Kirk Campbell
Defendant:
Celeste J.M., A. Shick, Ennis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Theus v. Walker County et al
as 7:2026cv00648
Plaintiff:
Albert Theus
Defendant:
Walker County, Aleisha Herron and QCHC Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Theus v. University of Phoenix, Inc.
as 1:2026cv00796
Plaintiff:
CHAKA THEUS
Defendant:
University of Phoenix, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
