Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1743
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00990
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
DEMARTINO v. UNITED STATES COPYRIGHT OFFICE et al
as 1:2012cv01256
Plaintiff:
THOMAS D. DEMARTINO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES COPYRIGHT OFFICE and UNITED STATES LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEMARTINO v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2012cv03849
Plaintiff:
THOMAS D. DEMARTINO
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILIES (DYFS), BERNADETTE DECASTRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeMartino v. Golston
as 4:2012cv00372
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. DeMartino
Defendant:
Caleb J. Golston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DeMartino v. Marion County et al
as 6:2012cv01098
Defendant:
City of Salem (Oregon), Jason Donner, Rolland Hayden and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. DeMartino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DeMartino v. City of Stayton, et al
as 6:2012cv01097
Defendant:
City of Stayton, Gary Doe, Matt Leonard and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. DeMartino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DeMartino v. Marion County et al
as 6:2011cv06326
Defendant:
City of Salem (Oregon), Jason Donner, Rolland Hayden and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. DeMartino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas DeMartino v. State of Oregon, et al
as 11-35846
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS D. DEMARTINO
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON, MARION COUNTY, a politcal subdivision and body politic of the State of Oregon, OREGON ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE and others
DeMartino v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2010cv06176
Defendant:
Pamela Abernethy, David Brewer, Jeff Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. DeMartino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
