Cases
NELSON v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2014cv01215
Plaintiff: PURNELL R. NELSON
Defendant: BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., DENIS DONOUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Banks v. Davenport, et al
as 13-2980
Plaintiff - Appellant: Frederick Banks
Defendant - Appellee: Davenport, Tracie Fenner, Malissa Jackson and others
Banks v. Davenport et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00480
Plaintiff: Frederick Banks
Defendant: Davenport, Tracie Fenner, Malissa Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. An Unknown Named Number of NSA Agents et al
as 1:2013cv02062
Plaintiff: Frederick Banks
Defendant: An Unknown Named Number of NSA Agents, At Least four FCC Forrest City unknown named Agents of the bop operating from the special housing Unit, An Unknown Named Number of Other United States Government Agents and others
Amicu: Nancy-Ann E. DeParle
Fifth_party_defendant: Mona K. Sutphen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Federal Housing Finance Agency v. Frederic Malek We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-7108
Plaintiff - Appellant: Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corporation Retiree Medical Benefits Trust, Derivatively on Behalf of Federal National Mortgage Association, Wayne County Employees' Retirement System, Derivatively on Behalf of Federal National Mortgage Association and Federal Housing Finance Agency, Derivatively on Behalf of Federal National Mortgage Association
Defendant - Appellee: Franklin D. Raines, Timothy Howard, Daniel H. Mudd and others
IN RE: FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & "ERISA" LITIGATION Featured Case
as 1:2005mc00234
Plaintiff: JEFFREY BADER, VINCENT VINCI, VINCENT VINCI and others
Defendant: FRANKLIN D. RAINES, FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, TIMOTHY HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?