Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Graeff v. United States Election Assistance Commission et al
as 4:2022cv00682
Plaintiff:
Alison Graeff and Ali
Defendant:
United States Election Assistance Commission, Thomas Hicks, Christy McCormick and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
HICKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv40112
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HICKS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hicks v. Phoenix Clean Energy, LLC
as 1:2020cv03820
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hicks
Defendant:
Phoenix Clean Energy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans v. Weitzell et al
as 4:2020cv00388
Defendant:
Ken Pierce, Thomas Hicks, Jeff Panknen and others
Plaintiff:
David Michael Evans
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Phoenix Clean Energy LLC
as 4:2020cv01210
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hicks
Defendant:
Phoenix Clean Energy, LLC and Phoenix Clean Energy LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HICKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv69332
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HICKS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HICKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv14144
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS DEANGELO THOMAS HICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv40031
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Adams v. Weitzell et al
as 4:2020cv00091
Defendant:
Waller, Thomas Hicks, Scott Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Roy Adams
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
