Cases 1 - 10 of 67
League of United Latin American Citizens, et al v. Executive Office of the President, et al
as 26-5182
Plaintiff:
League of United Latin American Citizens, Secure Families Initiative, Arizona Students' Association and others
Defendant:
Executive Office of the President, United States Election Assistance Commission, Brianna Schletz, in her official capacity as Executive Director of the United States Election Assistance Commission and others
Intervenor:
Republican National Committee
League of United Latin American Citizens, et al v. Executive Office of the President, et al
as 26-5102
Plaintiff:
League of United Latin American Citizens, Secure Families Initiative, Arizona Students' Association and others
Defendant:
Executive Office of the President, United States Election Assistance Commission, Brianna Schletz, in her official capacity as Executive Director of the United States Election Assistance Commission and others
Intervenor:
Republican National Committee
League of United Latin American Citizens, et al v. Executive Office of the President, et al
as 26-5099
Plaintiff:
League of United Latin American Citizens, Secure Families Initiative, Arizona Students' Association and others
Defendant:
Executive Office of the President, United States Election Assistance Commission, Brianna Schletz, in her official capacity as Executive Director of the United States Election Assistance Commission and others
Intervenor:
Republican National Committee
League of United Latin American Citizens, et al v. Executive Office of the President, et al
as 26-5098
Plaintiff:
League of United Latin American Citizens, Secure Families Initiative, Arizona Students' Association and others
Defendant:
Executive Office of the President, United States Election Assistance Commission, Brianna Schletz, in her official capacity as Executive Director of the United States Election Assistance Commission and others
Intervenor:
Republican National Committee
Movant:
Jose A. Perez
State of Washington, et al. v. Trump, et al.
as 26-1429
Plaintiff:
STATE OF WASHINGTON and STATE OF OREGON
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, President, United States of America, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, DOJ - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
USA, et al v. Michael Horowitz, et al
as 25-7211
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel. Timothy V. Shindelar; ex rel. Gregory Stenstrom; ex rel. Christine I. Heitman; ex rel. Robert C. Mancini, Timothy V. Shindelar, Gregory Stenstrom and others
Defendant:
Michael E. Horowitz, William P. Barr, James McHenry and others
League of United Latin American Citizens, et al v. Executive Office of the President, et al
as 25-5478
Plaintiff:
League of United Latin American Citizens, Secure Families Initiative, Arizona Students' Association and others
Defendant:
Executive Office of the President, United States Election Assistance Commission, Brianna Schletz, in her official capacity as Executive Director of the United States Election Assistance Commission and others
Intervenor:
Republican National Committee
Amicus Curiae:
Lawyers Defending American Democracy, Inc.
League of United Latin American Citizens, et al v. Executive Office of the President, et al
as 25-5476
Plaintiff:
League of United Latin American Citizens, Secure Families Initiative, Arizona Students' Association and others
Defendant:
Executive Office of the President, United States Election Assistance Commission, Brianna Schletz, in her official capacity as Executive Director of the United States Election Assistance Commission and others
Intervenor:
Republican National Committee
Amicus Curiae:
Lawyers Defending American Democracy, Inc.
Gunter v. U.S. Election Assistance Commission
as 3:2025cv02251
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Rae Gunter
Defendant:
U.S. Election Assistance Commission, Donald L. Palmer, Thomas Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
