Cases 1 - 10 of 15
TEXT ADS AND MARKETING, LLC v. RAFFERTY et al
as 2:2024cv01468
Defendant:
GRETCHEN A. MUNDORFF, THOMAS J. FARRELL, JOHN C. RAFFERTY, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
TEXT ADS AND MARKETING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Urve Maggitti v. Bret Binder, et al
as 24-2737
Defendant:
BRIDGET GALLOWAY OWEN, ROSANA CASTRO, P. KEVIN BROBSON and others
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Urve Maggitti v. William Mahon, et al
as 24-2554
Defendant:
NANCY L. CLEMENS, MICHAEL BRUNELLE, JERRY M. LEHOCKY and others
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Richard Silverberg v. DuPont De Nemours Inc, et al
as 24-1775
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. SILVERBERG, Esq. and RICHARD J. SILVERBERG
Defendant:
DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC, DOW INC, CORTEVA INC and others
SILVERBERG v. DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. SILVERBERG
Defendant:
DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC., DOW, INC., CORTEVA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Urve Maggitti v. William Mahon, et al
as 23-3275
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. MAHON, JOHN HALL, DEBRA TODD and others
Alan v. Farrell et al
as 6:2023cv06734
Plaintiff:
David P. Alan
Defendant:
Thomas J. Farrell, Esq., David N. Kaplan, CPA and Kenneth Perkins, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
MAGGITTI v. MAHON et al
as 2:2023cv04359
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. MAHON, JOHN HALL, DEBRA TODD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAGGITTI v. HON. BRET M. BINDER et al
as 2:2023cv02273
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
HON. BRET M. BINDER, HON. ANTHONY T. VERWEY, HON. WILLIAM P. MAHON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GREENBERG v. HAGGERTY et al
as 2:2020cv03822
Defendant:
JOHN F. CORDISCO, JERRY M. LEHOCKY, JOHN C. RAFFERTY and others
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY GREENBERG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
