Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Richard Silverberg v. DuPont De Nemours Inc, et al
as 24-1775
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. SILVERBERG, Esq.
Defendant:
DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC, DOW INC, CORTEVA INC and others
SILVERBERG v. DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. SILVERBERG
Defendant:
DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC., DOW, INC., CORTEVA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Urve Maggitti v. William Mahon, et al
as 23-3275
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. MAHON, JOHN HALL, DEBRA TODD and others
Alan v. Farrell et al
as 6:2023cv06734
Plaintiff:
David P. Alan
Defendant:
Thomas J. Farrell, Esq., David N. Kaplan, CPA and Kenneth Perkins, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
MAGGITTI v. MAHON et al
as 2:2023cv04359
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. MAHON, JOHN HALL, DEBRA TODD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAGGITTI v. HON. BRET M. BINDER et al
as 2:2023cv02273
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
HON. BRET M. BINDER, HON. ANTHONY T. VERWEY, HON. WILLIAM P. MAHON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GREENBERG v. HAGGERTY et al
as 2:2020cv03822
Defendant:
JOHN F. CORDISCO, JERRY M. LEHOCKY, JOHN C. RAFFERTY and others
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY GREENBERG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Amor et al
as 1:2019cv02078
Defendant:
Kevin M. Slawin, Reid M. Huber, James M. Daly and others
Nominal Defendant:
Bellicum Pharamceuticals, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jessica Amor and Mildred Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ludovissy et al v. Bellicum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv02450
Defendant:
Kevin M. Slawin, Reid M. Huber, James M. Daly and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Ludovissy and Ann Gordon Trammell
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv40019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
