Cases 1 - 10 of 20
JOHNSON v. COMMUNITY LOAN SERVICING, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00788
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JOHNSON
Defendant:
COMMUNITY LOAN SERVICING, LLC, SN SERVICING CORPORATION, WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
JOHNSON v. USA
as 1:2022cv00902
Petitioner:
WAYNE THOMAS JOHNSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
ALLEN v. GUILFORD TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE et al
as 1:2022cv00750
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant:
GUILFORD TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE, RONNAL FORD, THOMAS JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. CROWLEY et al
as 1:2016cv00126
Plaintiff:
WAYNE THOMAS JOHNSON
Defendant:
DANIEL CROWLEY, MOFFITT, GREGORY HAYNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. RANDOLPH COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2014cv00654
Plaintiff:
WAYNE THOMAS JOHNSON
Defendant:
RANDOLPH COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. DUKE ENERGY RETIREMENT CASH BALANCE PLAN et al
as 1:2013cv00156
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JOHNSON
Defendant:
DUKE ENERGY RETIREMENT CASH BALANCE PLAN and DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
JOHNSON et al v. WILLIS et al
as 1:2012cv01376
Plaintiff:
WAYNE THOMAS JOHNSON and STEVE HOLLAND
Defendant:
TIMOTHY WILLIS, RONALD H. PEELER, BUNTING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. CURRY et al
as 1:2011cv00852
Plaintiff:
WAYNE THOMAS JOHNSON
Defendant:
BRENT CURRY, MIKE FUQUAY, BURLINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. CURRY et al
as 1:2010cv00499
Plaintiff:
WAYNE THOMAS JOHNSON
Defendant:
BRENT CURRY, JULIAN DOBY and R.M. FUQUAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. MINTER et al
as 1:2010cv00080
Plaintiff:
WAYNE THOMAS JOHNSON
Defendant:
L. MINTER, R. FOSTER, JOSEPH LIGHTSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
