Cases 21 - 30 of 41
TAYLOR v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2013cv00140
Plaintiff:
THOMAS TAYLOR
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY PRISON and TYRONE GILLIARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Commonwealth of KY
as 0:2012cv00099
Petitioner:
Eric Thomas Taylor
Respondent:
Commonwealth of KY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOOD et al v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2012cv06395
Plaintiff:
TATANISHA HOOD, RONSHON BOWSER, DANTEE FORREST and others
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERIOR COURT OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY and CUMBERLAND COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Bracey v. James Grondin, et al
as 12-1644
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY BRACEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES GRONDIN, THOMAS TAYLOR, ERIC HUNT, Correctional Officer and others
Larry Bracey v. Rick Raemisch, et al
as 11-3841
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY BRACEY
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK RAEMISCH, PETER HUIBREGTSE, Warden, JAMES GRONDIN and others
Bracey, Larry v. Raemisch, Rick et al
as 3:2010cv00287
Plaintiff:
Larry Bracey
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch , Peter Huibregtse , James Grondin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Scism et al
as 1:2010cv00424
Plaintiff:
Thomas Taylor
Defendant:
William Scism, J. Berkihiser and Todd Cerney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
USA v. Thomas Taylor
as 09-3097
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Thomas Taylor
Bradford Taylor, Sr. v. John Salazar, et al
as 09-55777
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRADFORD THOMAS TAYLOR, Sr.
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN F. SALAZAR, Warden-CVSP
Respondent:
CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS
USA v. Thomas Taylor
as 09-2381
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS TAYLOR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
