Cases 1 - 10 of 12
LEWIS v. MASSACHUSETTS INC et al
as 2:2022cv04814
Defendant:
THOMAS WESTERMAN WOLF, MASSACHUSETTS INC, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS and others
Plaintiff:
SAMMEISO LEONARD LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
REDMAN v. WOLF et al
as 2:2022cv03389
Plaintiff:
FENICIA REDMAN
Defendant:
THOMAS WESTERMAN WOLF, JOSHUA SHAPIRO, LESLIE PIKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
BURLEY v. OBERLANDER et al
as 1:2021cv00300
Petitioner:
KEITH LAMONT BURLEY, JR.
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT OBERLANDER, ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO, JOSHUA D. LAMANCUSA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GARCIA II v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2020cv02657
Defendant:
JAMES-C DUFF, GERALD-AUSTIN [MCHUGH], DONALD-JOHN TRUMP and others
Plaintiff:
HAMLET GARCIA II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04983
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
JUNG YUN v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2018cv17283
Plaintiff:
GLORIA SUN JUNG YUN
Defendant:
ROBERT TORRES, CHADWICK LISA THOMPSON, REX W. TILERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jung v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvaina et al
as 3:2018cv01248
Plaintiff:
Gloria Sun Jung Yun
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvaina, Thomas Westerman Wolf, Garrett T. Lare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
YUN v. CITY OF STROUDSBURG et al
as 1:2018cv01194
Plaintiff:
GLORIA SUN JUNG YUN
Defendant:
CITY OF STROUDSBURG, CHIEF DIRECTOR, CYNTHIA TALAMO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YUN v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2018cv01804
Plaintiff:
GLORIA SUN JUNG YUN
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, METHA, NICHOLAS P PARENTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
