Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Gindt, II v. LifeHope Labs et al
as 1:2022cv03198
Plaintiff:
Henry Sylvain Gindt, II
Defendant:
LifeHope Labs, Alan Brock and Tim Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Durwin Bonds v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 21-7146
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DURWIN EVANT BONDS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, ROANOKE CITY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, ROANOKE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Bonds v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 7:2021cv00363
Defendant:
Sheriff Tim Allen, Roanoke City Commonwealth Attorney Office, Roanoke City Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Durwin Evant Bonds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv06217
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIM ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Allen et al
as 7:2021cv00080
Defendant:
Captain Monica Perkins, Major David Bell and Sheriff Tim Allen
Plaintiff:
Darryl Ramon Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Allen et al
as 7:2021cv00034
Defendant:
Deputy Elmore, Sheriff Tim Allen, Major Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Alvin L. Jones, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donavan v. Allen, et al
as 7:2021cv00017
Defendant:
Amber Dane, Heather Glenn, Jenkins and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa C. Donavan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Allen et al
as 7:2020cv00652
Defendant:
Major David Bell, Sherriff Tim Allen and Capt Monica Perkins
Plaintiff:
Darryl Ramon Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv94800
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIM ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALLEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv93056
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIM ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
