Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
SHERIDAN v. PIPE MONOPOLY
as 2:2016cv06383
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY SHERIDAN
Defendant: PIPE MONOPOLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheridan v. Diversified Consultants Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv10144
Defendant: Diversified Consultants Inc , LiveVox Inc and Rafal Leszcynski
Plaintiff: Timothy Sheridan
Timothy Sheridan v. Commissioner of Internal Reven
as 15-2266
Petitioner - Appellant: TIMOTHY SHERIDAN
Respondent - Appellee: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Sheridan v. US
as 15-5073
Plaintiff / Appellant: TIMOTHY SHERIDAN
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Gil v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv01709
Defendant: Det. Patrick Barry, City of New York, John Doe 1-3 and others
Plaintiff: Jeramy Gil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHERIDAN v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00696
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY SHERIDAN
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Mojica et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv02399
Defendant: Gilbert Barkman, Peter Carretta, City of New York and others
Plaintiff: Emmanuel Charles, Andrew Civil, Kerri-Ann Cowan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dewar et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv02400
Plaintiff: Sade Avis, Ramone Dewar, Unique Garcia and others
Defendant: Gilbert Barkman, Peter Carretta, City of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bryant v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv02410
Defendant: Sgt. Gilbert Barkman, Peter Carretta, City of New York and others
Plaintiff: Chauncey Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Laguerre v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv02409
Defendant: Sgt. Gilbert Barkman, Peter Carretta, City of New York and others
Plaintiff: Marvin Laguerre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?