Cases 1 - 10 of 16
USA v. Timothy Smith
as 23-1256
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TIMOTHY SMITH, also known MUSA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
SMITH et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv19841
Defendant:
PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF MARGIE HENDERSON and TIMOTHY SMITH
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TROTMAN v. SMITH
as 1:2020cv00068
Plaintiff:
ENERVA W. TROTMAN
Defendant:
TIMOTHY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
USA v. Timothy Smith
as 19-1597
Defendant / Appellant:
TIMOTHY SMITH
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SMITH v. PFIZER, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv07682
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY SMITH
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. PFIZER, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv06730
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY SMITH
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv05021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pauline Bailey v. BS Quarries Inc, et al
as 16-2169
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PAULINE BAILEY, Administrator of the Estate of Wesley Sherwood, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
BS QUARRIES INC, DAMASCUS 535, TNT ONE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and others
Defendant - Appellant:
DAMASCUS 535 QUARRY AND STONE PRODUCTS LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
