Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Tolson v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Ricky Tolson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Tolson v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Bradley Tolson
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., John Does 1-10 and Corporations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
(PC) Blake v. S. Foster et al.
as 1:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Garrod Blake
Defendant:
S Foster, D. Saucedo, R Tolson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrod Blake v. S. Foster et al.
as 2:2022cv01558
Plaintiff:
Garrod Blake
Defendant:
S. Foster, D. Saucedo, R. Tolson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garland Jones v. USDC-CAFR
as 20-72939
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Not Classified By Court:
In re: GARLAND A. JONES, TOLSON, MULE CREEK STATE PRISON and others
Petitioner:
GARLAND A. JONES
Wilson v. Valdez-Perner et al
as 3:2020cv04801
Defendant:
Jim Robertson, K. Royal, C. Munoz and others
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garland Jones v. Tolson, et al
as 19-17262
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARLAND A. JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
TOLSON, MULE CREEK STATE PRISON and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION
Dustin Faust et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 3:2019cv03025
Plaintiff:
John Marshall, Gregory S. Brown, Ashley Cryer and others
Defendant:
1-50 Does and FCA U.S., LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dustin Faust et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 2:2019cv04231
Plaintiff:
John Marshall, Gregory S. Brown, Ashley Cryer and others
Defendant:
FCA US LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
