Cases 1 - 10 of 100
State of California, et al v. State of Alabama, et al
as 26-1779
Plaintiff:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF NEVADA and others
Appellant:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, in the official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, TODD BLANCHE, in the official capacity as Acting U.S. Attorney General and others
Interested Party:
SOCIETY FOR RULE OF LAW INSTITUTE, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PA, LISA LAWITZKE, Clerk, Bellevue Township, Michigan and others
Amicus Curiae:
JERRY BROWN, NEIL ABERCROMBIE, KATE BROWN and others
State of California, et al v. Trump, et al
as 26-1774
Plaintiff:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF NEVADA and others
Defendant:
FRANK J. BISIGNANO, in the official capacity as Commissioner of the United States Social Security Administration, TODD BLANCHE, in the official capacity as Acting U.S. Attorney General, DEREK T. KAN, in the official capacity as Vice Chairman of the Postal Service Board of Governors and others
Interested Party:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PA, LISA LAWITZKE, Clerk, Bellevue Township, Michigan, BOSTON, MA and others
Amicus Curiae:
JERRY BROWN, NEIL ABERCROMBIE, KATE BROWN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv60641
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CRUZ v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE et al
as 1:2025cv04349
Plaintiff:
ROGELIO CRUZ, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FARM SERVICE AGENCY, TOM VILSACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Oregon, et al. v. Trump, et al.
as 25-6268
Plaintiff:
STATE OF OREGON and CITY OF PORTLAND
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, In his official capacity as President of the United States, PETER HEGSETH, In his official capacity as Secretary of Defense, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and others
Intervenor:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT LEADERS, IN STATE OF OREGON V. TRUMP, STATE OF WASHINGTON and others
New Mexico Cattle Growers' Association, et al v. United States Forest Service, et al
as 25-2034
Petitioner:
NEW MEXICO CATTLE GROWERS' ASSOCIATION, SPUR LAKE CATTLE COMPANY, NELSON SHIRLEY and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE, CAMILLE HOWES, in her official capacity as Supervisor of the Gila National Forest and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv00278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Arizona State Legislature, et al. v. Biden, et al.
as 25-1370
Plaintiff:
ARIZONA STATE LEGISLATURE, by and through the President of the Arizona Senate, Warren Petersen, and the Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives, Steve Montenegro, KIMBERLY YEE, in her official capacity as Treasurer of the State of Arizona, COUNTY OF MOHAVE and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States, DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Intervenor:
STATE OF ARIZONA and KATIE HOBBS, Governor of Arizona
Wildearth Guardians, et al. v. Bucknall, et al.
as 25-212
Plaintiff:
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, TRAP FREE MONTANA and WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE WILDLIFE SERVICES, a federal agency, DALIN TIDWELL, in his official capacity as State Director, Wildlife Services-Montana, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, a federal department and others
Intervenor:
STATE OF MONTANA and MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF FISH, WILDLIFE AND PARKS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
