Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tony Papageorge, Jr. v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-12687
Petitioner / Appellant:
TONY ALEXANDER PAPAGEORGE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Papageorge v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2023cv14068
Plaintiff:
Tony Alexander Papageorge, Jr.
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Clarke
as 1:2022cv01108
Petitioner:
Tony Alexander Williams
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hamilton v. Nelson
as 4:2020cv00053
Not Classified By Court:
Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit
Petitioner:
Tony Alexander Hamilton
Respondent:
Shane Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gilbreath v. Davis et al
as 6:2019cv00668
Plaintiff:
Antonia Drum Heart Gilbreath and Tony Alexander Gilbreath
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice and Director, TDCJ Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Hinds County Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2017cv00508
Plaintiff:
Kevin Leigh Williams
Defendant:
Mary Rushing, Hinds County, Victor Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Lovewhich et al
as 3:2017cv00365
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Terrell Butler
Defendant:
Criag Lovewhich, Tony Alexander and Victor P. Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2015cv00344
Plaintiff:
Tony Alexander Hamilton
Defendant:
State of Utah and David J Angerhofer PC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
