Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Braden v. Benton et al
as 3:2023cv03588
Plaintiff:
Travis Wade Braden
Defendant:
City of Benton, David Bartoni, Anthony Skobel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRITT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv18946
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS WADE BRITT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Braden v. City of Marion Illinois et al
as 3:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Travis Wade Braden
Defendant:
City of Marion Illinois, Todd Hunter, Benny Vick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WADE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv04086
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS WADE
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Travis Amaral v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 19-15003
Petitioner / Appellant:
TRAVIS WADE AMARAL
Respondent / Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Rankin v. Reyna et al
as 6:2018cv00043
Defendant:
Deputy Alex Reyna and Deputy Mike Perez
Plaintiff:
Travis Wade Rankin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
First Home Bank v. Mountain Desert Empire LLC et al
as 2:2017mc00075
Plaintiff:
First Home Bank
Defendant:
Mountain Desert Empire LLC and Travis Wade Duggins
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
First Home Bank v. Mountain Desert Empire LLC et al
as 8:2017cv00775
Plaintiff:
First Home Bank
Defendant:
Mountain Desert Empire LLC and Travis Wade Duggins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amaral #097231 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv00594
Petitioner:
Travis Wade Amaral
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WADE v. MEDICAL CONTRACT MONITOR, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
as 1:2014cv01513
Defendant:
MEDICAL CONTRACT MONITOR, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS WADE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
