Cases 31 - 40 of 141
BROWN v. LEVY et al
as 2:2009cv03857
Petitioner:
KEVIN BROWN
Respondent:
TROY LEVY and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
BROWN v. LEVI et al
as 2:2009cv03177
Petitioner:
KEVIN A. BROWN
Respondent:
TROY LEVI, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
REYNOLDS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2009cv03096
Plaintiff:
GARY I. REYNOLDS, M.D.
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL, ERIC L. HOLDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Kareem Millhouse v. R. Arbasak, et al
as 09-2858
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE
Defendant - Appellee:
R. ARBASAK, D. DEMPSEY, Lieutenant, JAMES GIBBS, S.I.S. LIEUTENANT and others
Kareem Millhouse v. R. Arbasak, et al
as 09-2709
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE
Defendant - Appellee:
R. ARBASAK, D. DEMPSEY, Lieutenant, JAMES GIBBS, S.I.S. LIEUTENANT and others
BRUCE v. LEVI
as 2:2009cv02101
Petitioner:
RONALD BRUCE
Respondent:
TROY LEVI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
BARRETT v. LEVI
as 1:2009cv02193
Petitioner:
MICHAEL BARRETT
Respondent:
TROY LEVI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kevin O. Rice v. Gary Reynolds, et al
as 09-1854
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN O. RICE
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY REYNOLDS, DR., M.D., ET AL, P.A. ZORILLA, PHYSICIANS ASSISTANT, P.A. MARTINEZ, PHYSICIANS ASSISTANT and others
Kevin O. Rice v. Gary Reynolds, et al
as 09-1978
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN O. RICE
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY REYNOLDS, M.D., Physician, P.A. ZORILLA, Physicians Assistant, P.A. MARTINEZ, Physicians Assistant and others
DUKA v. LEVI
as 1:2009cv01547
Plaintiff:
DRITAN DUKA
Defendant:
TROY LEVI
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
