Cases 1 - 10 of 67
Cox v. Board of Parole et al
as 8:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Travis Cox
Defendant:
Board of Parole, Office of Parole Supervision, Office of Parole Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TWISS v. USA
as 1:2023cv00417
Plaintiff:
TROYLYNN TWISS
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
David Jacob v. Rosalyn Cotton, et al
as 23-1023
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David H. Jacob
Defendant / Appellee:
Rosalyn Cotton, Chairperson, Nebraska Board of Parole, Mark T. Langan, Member, Nebraska Board of Parole, Robert Twiss, Member, Nebraska Board of Parole and others
Freedom Mortgage Corporation v. Twiss
as 1:2022cv00872
Plaintiff:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Defendant:
David V. Twiss
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
Hanes v. Frakes et al
as 8:2022cv00156
Plaintiff:
Elvis Hanes
Defendant:
Scott Frakes, Rosalyn Cotton, Layne Gissler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacob v. Cotton et al
as 8:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
David H. Jacob
Defendant:
Rosalyn Cotton, Mark T. Langan, Robert Twiss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TWISS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv62260
Plaintiff:
BRANDON TWISS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Twiss v. El Paso County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2021cv02357
Defendant:
Tony Twiss, William Elder, William Huffor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyrrell v. Frakes et al
as 8:2021cv00210
Respondent:
Teresa L. Bittinger, Rosalyn Cotton, Scott Frakes and others
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Gregory Tyrrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00857
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
