Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Tyrell Henderson v. Matthew Borowicz, et al
as 26-1303
Plaintiff:
TYRELL HENDERSON
Defendant:
MATTHEW BOROWICZ, Corrections Officer, in individual capacity identified on initiating document as Unknown Borowicz and GABRIEL WILHELM, Corrections Officer, in individual capacity identified on initiating document as Unknown Wilhelm
Henderson v. Melton et al
as 4:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Henderson
Defendant:
Steve Henry and Tonya Melton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Johnson et al
as 4:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
General Inmate Population of Chippewa Cree Tribal Adult Detention Center, Tyrell Henderson, Tyson Eagleman and others
Defendant:
Annaleese Johnson, Dalelynn Henderson and Steve Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson #810508 v. Borowicz et al
as 1:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Henderson #810508
Defendant:
Unknown Borowicz and Unknown Wihelm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Tyrell Henderson
as 17-30136
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TYRELL HENDERSON
Henderson v. Taylor et al
as 1:2017cv04496
Plaintiff:
Tyrel Henderson
Defendant:
Taylor, Johnson and Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Alvarez et al
as 1:2017cv03977
Plaintiff:
Tyrel Henderson
Defendant:
Alvarez and Program Aide, Southwell Boulevard Men's Shelter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Vann et al
as 1:2017cv03685
Plaintiff:
Tyrel Henderson
Defendant:
Vann, Laude and Yellowday
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Vann et al
as 1:2017cv01171
Plaintiff:
Tyrel Henderson
Defendant:
Vann, Taylor and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00085
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
