Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Sinclair v. Davis et al
as 3:2023cv00219
Plaintiff:
Dominique Sinclair
Defendant:
Anthony Tyrone Davis, Francis Washington, Scottish Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Sinclair v. Davis et al
as 3:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Dominique Sinclair
Defendant:
Tyrone Davis, Francis Washington, Scotty Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Tyrone Smith v. Candance Whitman
as 22-1814
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRONE DAVIS SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
CANDANCE WHITMAN
JONES v. INTERSTATE GENERAL MEDIA et al
as 2:2014cv06950
Plaintiff:
BRANDON C. JONES
Defendant:
INTERSTATE GENERAL MEDIA, GOOGLE CORPORATION, TYRONE DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRATER et al v. PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2011cv06962
Plaintiff:
CHARMAINE PRATER and (MINOR CHILD) PRATER
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY, TAXI AND LEMO, OLD CITY CAB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv05958
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
PHILLIPS v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2009cv01900
Plaintiff:
DeVINN PHILLIPS
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and TYRONE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Davis v. Bexley Police Department et al
as 2:2008cv00750
Plaintiff:
Travis Tyrone Davis
Defendant:
Bexley Police Department and City of Bexley
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ingram et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2008cv01055
Plaintiff:
Shamel Ingram, Tyrone Davis and Samuel Bethea
Defendant:
City of New York, Raymond Kelly, Robert Brower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
