Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Talamantez #406724 v. Tanner
as 1:2024cv00221
Petitioner:
Paul Talamantez #406724
Respondent:
Jeff Tanner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Talamantez v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv01402
Petitioner:
Ruben Talamantez, Jr.
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Talamantez #406724 v. Washington
as 1:2023cv01171
Plaintiff:
Paul Talamantez #406724
Defendant:
Heidi Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberto Talamantez v. Steve Smith
as 2:2023cv08468
Petitioner:
Roberto Talamantez
Respondent:
Steve Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Talamantez
as 22-50632
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Roger Talamantez
Talamantez v. United States of America
as 7:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Roger Talamantez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Talamantez v. Gastelo
as 1:2016cv01712
Petitioner:
Robert Talamantez
Respondent:
Josie Gastelo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ernest Talamantez v. Bexar County Sheriff, et al
as 16-51243
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERNEST TALAMANTEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
BEXAR COUNTY SHERIFF, in Official and Individual Capacity, DEPUTY FNU RIOS, in Official and Individual Capacity, DEPUTY FNU FLORES, in Official and Individual Capacity and others
Talamantez v. Bexar County Sheriff et al
as 5:2016cv00012
Defendant:
Bexar County Sheriff, Deputy FNU Flores, Deputy FNU Rios and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Talamantez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cavalier v. San Diego, County of et al
as 3:2014cv01691
Plaintiff:
Marcos Cavalier
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, William Gore, Kamoss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
