Cases 21 - 30 of 211
John Tomes v. Cheron T. Nash et al
as 1:2022cv01140
Plaintiff:
John Tomes
Defendant:
Cheron T. Nash, Talladega FCI and Lela Hansen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Robert Sills v. FCI Talladega Warden
as 22-12656
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT M. SILLS
Respondent / Appellee:
FCI TALLADEGA WARDEN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00996
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Brooks et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv00559
Plaintiff:
Vicky L Brooks and Joshua Brooks
Defendant:
United States of America, UAB Hospital, UAHSF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
CRAWFORD v. WEST TENNESSEE DETENTION FACILITY et al
as 1:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
DEMARCUS DEON CRAWFORD
Defendant:
WEST TENNESSEE DETENTION FACILITY, HUGH HARVEY, JR., JODY S. PICKENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Le'Andre Earl v. Stephen Hoey
as 21-7559
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LE'ANDRE EARL
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHEN HOEY, DO, Doctor
Defendant:
CELIA HANSEN, HSA/RN, WARDEN B. H. ROMERO, F.C.I. Talladega and WARDEN BRYAN K. DOBBS, F.C.I. Williamsburg
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
