Cases 41 - 50 of 508
Tamez Garza v. Garland
as 21-60486
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
Edgardo Tamez Garza
Tamez Rodriguez v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
as 7:2021cv00156
Plaintiff:
Rodrigo Tamez Rodriguez
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Placencia v. Tamez et al
as 1:2021cv00153
Plaintiff:
Michael L Placencia
Defendant:
Dekalb Co. Sheriffs Department, David Cserep, II and Matthew Tamez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cantu v. City of Weslaco Texas et al
as 7:2021cv00155
Plaintiff:
Ruben Cantu
Defendant:
Roberto Rodriguez, City of Weslaco Texas, Christian Tamez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAMEZ v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv08778
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
MARIA TAMEZ
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tamez et al v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
as 7:2021cv00130
Plaintiff:
Myrna Gomez and Benjamin Tamez
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Thomas v. Stafflink
as 21-20066
Defendant / Appellee:
Karen Pitts, Link Staffing Services, Mario Tamez and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michel Thomas
TAMEZ v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2020cv20671
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
ANNA TAMEZ
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Nathan Tamez
as 20-40848
Defendant / Appellant:
Nathan Lee Tamez
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
SELPH-TAMEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv15216
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TERESA SELPH-TAMEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
