Cases 1 - 10 of 401
Lee v. Parton et al
as 1:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee
Defendant:
Chad Parton, Tammy Warren and Tennessee Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. Coffee County Mayor et al
as 1:2024cv00193
Petitioner:
Cody Alan King
Respondent:
Coffee County Mayor, Sheriff Chad Partin, Frank Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Nelson v. Hinson et al
as 1:2024cv01117
Plaintiff:
Anthony Nelson
Defendant:
Marty Hinson, Tammy Ryan, Maggie Claudell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Robertson
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Brent A. Cooper, Tammy Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffelt v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Tammy Dee Coffelt
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lyons v. Warren et al
as 1:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Anthony Antonio Lyons
Defendant:
Tammy Warren and Chad Partin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nokes v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 3:2024cv00531
Plaintiff:
Tammy Kim Nokes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Durham v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02116
Not Yet Classified:
Jamita Swearengen
Plaintiff:
Tammy Durham
Defendant:
Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
