Cases 1 - 10 of 1,680
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04223
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Spengler v. Williams, et al.
as 24-3219
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. SPENGLER
Defendant:
FREDERICK D. WILLIAMS, Dr.; individual capacity, ZUNIGA, Ms.; individual capacity, HIMAYA, RN; individual capacity and others
Heidi Yu Ling Yu v. Eagle Cargolink Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv04111
Plaintiff:
Heidi Yu Ling Yu
Defendant:
Peter Presnell, Michelle Presnell, Ashley Presnell and others
Cross Defendant:
Qingchuan Tan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
No Tan Lines Republik v. Anderson et al
as 2:2024cv00870
Plaintiff:
No Tan Lines Republik
Defendant:
Jim Anderson, Jeanine D'Errico and G Murrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lucius et al v Naphcare Inc.
as 1:2024cv01242
Plaintiff:
Estate of Alizon Lopez and SHAWN LUCIUS
Defendant:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONES OF COUNTY OF MESA, COLORADO, Todd Rowell, Craig Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 198
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Tan v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
as 24-1162
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER SHAPOVALOV, CHEW KING TAN, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and IGOR LI
Defendant:
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and MORGAN STANLEY
Tan v. Washtenaw County Health Department et al
as 5:2024cv11137
Plaintiff:
Susan Qiao Qian Tan
Defendant:
Washtenaw County Health Department, Washtenaw County Sheriff's Office, Washtenaw County Community Mental Health and others
TAN et al v. LO et al
as 1:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
CHI HUI TAN and KUNG TUAN TAN
Defendant:
VICTOR K S LO and EVER SPRING CO INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
