Cases 1 - 10 of 29
TAN et al v. LO et al
as 1:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
CHI HUI TAN and KUNG TUAN TAN
Defendant:
VICTOR K S LO and EVER SPRING CO INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
USA v. 1). Rifle AK-47 pistol, model MDLN-PAP, 7.62x39 caliber Serial Number PAP042331 et al
as 3:2022cv01434
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
1). Rifle AK-47 pistol, model MDLN-PAP, 7.62x39 caliber Serial Number PAP042331, 2). Magazine Cal. 7.62x39, 3). Ammunition: Cal 7.62x39-(38 in total) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
Wampler v. Alves
as 1:2021cv11982
Petitioner:
Larry D. Wampler, Jr. and Hung Tan Vo
Respondent:
Superintendent Nelson Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pham v. National Railroad Passanger Corporation
as 1:2021cv10859
Defendant:
National Railroad Passanger Corporation
Plaintiff:
Tan Pham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Pham v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 1:2021cv10673
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Plaintiff:
Tan Pham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
US Securities and Exchange Commission v. Kabra, et al.
as 1:2019cv11676
Defendant:
LaunchByte.io, LLC, Tanmaya Kabra, Tan Kabra and others
Plaintiff:
US Securities and Exchange Commission
Tierney et al v. Town of Framingham et al
as 1:2017cv11657
Plaintiff:
Thomas Tierney and Joann M. Tierney
Defendant:
Town of Framingham, Stacey Macauder, Phillip Hurton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1489
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00421
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
ECCO Sko A/S et al v. Parker et al
as 1:2016cv00289
Defendant:
John Does 1- 20, Flatstick Commerce LLC, Alan Parker and others
Plaintiff:
ECCO Sko A/S and ECCO USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
