Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Grant v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00586
Petitioner:
Tanya Parrish Grant
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
United States of America v. Mountaineer Manufacturing, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00417
Defendant:
Tanya Middleton, WVTC LLC, Workforce West Virginia and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hughes et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2019cv00037
Plaintiff:
Douglas Leigh Hughes and Karen Diann Davis Hughes
Defendant:
United States of America and State of West Virginia
Petitioner:
Tanya S. Thorson, Jessica Nicole Thompson, Rebecca S. Pierson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Paperd v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01065
Plaintiff:
Tanya Paperd
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mathess et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company
as 2:2018cv00756
Plaintiff:
Gearold G. Mathess, Jr. and Tanya Mathess
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beauford v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00644
Plaintiff:
Tanya Beauford
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Benjamin v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00193
Plaintiff:
L'Tanya Benjamin
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kessinger v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv02736
Plaintiff:
Tanya Kessinger
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nestor et al v. Spa Guy, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2017cv00021
Plaintiff:
William Nestor , Jennifer Nestor , Andrew Kacik and others
Defendant:
Spa Guy, L.L.C. and Future Spa Covers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
