Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv03670
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv24466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Kaldor v. Taos County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 1:2026cv02092
Plaintiff:
Alexander Kaldor
Defendant:
Taos County Board of County Commissioners, Conrad Sandoval and Nicholas Holley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Tao v. Moreland et al
as 3:2026cv06240
Plaintiff:
Liying Tao
Defendant:
Christopher Moreland, East Bay Community Law Center, Kobre & Kim LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Joshua S. Dudley v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2026cv01530
Plaintiff:
Joshua S. Dudley
Defendant:
County of Orange, Orange County Health Care Agency, Orange County Behavioral Health Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
CHUNHUA LI v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations identified in Schedule A
as 1:2026cv05733
Plaintiff:
CHUNHUA LI
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations identified in Schedule A, 3XLuWTu, 8003TKA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv05193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv02517
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
