Cases 1 - 10 of 12
E.B., et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2019cv08078
Defendant:
City of Brentwood and Taylor Johnson
Plaintiff:
minor E. B., Judith Ann Birba and E. B.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cerny et al v. Sky Lounge LLC
as 2:2018cv04880
Plaintiff:
Paola Canas, Carissa Rosario, Julianne Klaren and others
Defendant:
Sky Lounge LLC and Sky Lounge LLC an Arizona Corporation doing business as Sky Lounge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Burciaga et al v. Metropolitan Bush Company LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01591
Plaintiff:
Jessica Burciaga, Brooke Taylor Johnson, Hillary Hepner and others
Defendant:
Metropolitan Bush Company LLC, Unknown Parties and Metropolitan Bush Company LLC an Arizona corporation doing business as Essex Gentlemen's Club
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv02028
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rolyat Taylor Johnson vs CA Institution for Men
as 5:2013cv01364
Respondent:
California Institution For Men, M Jureidini and Dr N Riaz
Petitioner:
Rolyat Taylor Johnson
Johnson vs CA Institution for Men
as 3:2013cv03014
Plaintiff:
Rolyat Taylor Johnson
Defendant:
California Institution for Men, N Riaz and M Jureidini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-16527
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Christopher Yanke v. City of Oakland, et al
as 10-16007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER YANKE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF OAKLAND, WAYNE TUCKER, DEBRA TAYLOR JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv05157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv05157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
