Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 387
TEEL v. COLVIN
as 2:2025cv00189
Defendant: CAROLYN COLVIN
Plaintiff: RASHEED A TEEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Styles v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2025cv00037
Plaintiff: Teel S Styles
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Basatne International, LLC v. Teele
as 4:2024cv01235
Plaintiff: Basatne International, LLC
Defendant: Stanley Randall Teele
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
McMillian v. Teel et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00768
Plaintiff: Marcus McMillian
Defendant: Anita Spivey, Carlton Teel and Christopher J. Gallops
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Teel v. Commissioner, SSA
as 5:2024cv00162
Plaintiff: Lora Teel
Defendant: Commissioner, SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Basatne International, LLC v. Teele
as 4:2024cv01110
Plaintiff: Basatne International, LLC
Defendant: Stanley (Randy) Teele
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Ballard (PS) v. Schultz et al
as 1:2024cv03059
Defendant: Mick Bunn, Darin Little, Mia Cox and others
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Ballard and Jacqueline-Sue Ballard
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ballard (PS) v. Schultz et al
as 1:2024cv02926
Defendant: Cody Prentice, Travis Peck, Sarah Handcock and others
Plaintiff: Danielle Elizabeth Ballard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra - Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Mayhue v. Thornton et al
as 4:2024cv00822
Defendant: Jacob Teel-Hamel, Pangburn, City of, John Does and others
Plaintiff: Douglas Cole Mayhue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Teel v. Payne
as 6:2024cv06130
Petitioner: Clifton Teel
Respondent: Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?