Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Morris et al v. City of Rockford et al
as 3:2020cv50384
Defendant:
City of Rockford, J. Carder, Pop Warner Sports League and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance Morris and Darnisha Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris et al v. City of Rockford et al
as 1:2020cv05933
Plaintiff:
Terrance Morris and Darnisha Morris
Defendant:
City of Rockford, J. Carder, Pop Warner Sports League and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORRIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv02424
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE MORRIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Morris v. Attorney General, State of Florida et al
as 6:2010cv01212
Petitioner:
Terrance Morris
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Terrance Morris, et al v. Jarrett Lanpher, et al
as 10-1960
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Terrance Morris, Ricardo Morris and Rosalind Morris
Defendant - Appellee:
Jarrett Lanpher, in his official capacity as a Kansas City, Missouri Police Department Officer, and as an individual, Robert Schweitzer, in his official capacity as a Kansas City, Missouri Police Department Officer, and as an individual, Mark Hockemeier, in his official capacity as a Kansas City, Missouri Police Department Officer, and as an individual and others
MORRIS v. TEMPLE INLAND
as 1:2009cv01168
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE MORRIS
Defendant:
TEMPLE INLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Terrance Morris, et al v. Jarrett Lanpher, et al
as 08-2040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Terrance Morris, Ricardo Morris and Rosalind Morris
Defendant - Appellee:
Jarrett Lanpher, In his official capacity as a Kansas City, Missouri Police Department Officer, and as an individual and Robert Schweitzer, In his official capacity as a Kansas City, Missouri Police Department Officer, and as an individual
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
