Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 20
James v. Venettozzi
as 19-870
Defendant: C.O. C. Stevens, G.M.C.F., Sgt. Woodruff, G.M.C.F., Lt. Pray, G.M.C.F. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Terrence James
Defendant / Appellee: Lt. Bradly
Jackson v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv22089
Plaintiff: Terrence James Jackson
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
James v. Venettozzi et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2016cv06285
Plaintiff: Terrence James
Defendant: D. Venettozzi, Marcus J. Mastracco, Woodruff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Sallaz et al
as 1:2015cv00176
Plaintiff: Terrence James Matthews
Defendant: Dennis Sallaz, Daryl Sallaz, National Financial Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. Craven
as 1:2012cv00165
Plaintiff: Terrence James Matthews
Defendant: Olivia Craven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Grant Thornton LLP v. JBPB & Co.
as 1:2011cv00795
Plaintiff: Grant Thornton LLP
Defendant: JBPB & CO. , Norman Tsui Ka Che, Ringo Chiu Wing Cheung and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00559
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Terrence Landry v. James Tilton
as 09-17585
Petitioner - Appellant: TERRENCE JAMES LANDRY
Respondent - Appellee: JAMES E. TILTON
Landry v. Tilton We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv01311
Petitioner: Terrence James Landry
Respondent: James Tilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffin et al v. New York City Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2007cv00530
Plaintiff: Anthony Devon Griffin and Ebony Samuel
Defendant: New York City Department of Correction, Gemyse Brown, Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?