Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bishop, et al v. DeLaval Inc., et al
as 5:2019cv06129
Defendant:
DeLaval Inc. and DeLaval International
Plaintiff:
Bernard Robillard, Terry Bishop, Denise Robillard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Abraham et al v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv04686
Plaintiff:
Leela Abraham, Jeffrey Acker, Judette Adams and others
Defendant:
American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc., Countywide Financial Corporation a Delaware corporation doing business as BAC Home Loans Servicing, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
de la Garza v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 0:2009cv01044
Plaintiff:
Cesar de la Garza
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Joan Fabian, Erik Skon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Woodrow Anderson v. CMS, et al
as 08-2863
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Woodrow Anderson
Defendant:
James Purkett, Superintendent, ERDCC, Terry Bishop, RN and Deborah Carter, RN
Defendant - Appellee:
CMS, Charles Chastain, Doctor, Donna Adams, RN and others
Jones v. Correctional Medical Services of Missouri et al
as 4:2008cv00316
Plaintiff:
Donald Jones
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services of Missouri, Elizabeth Conley, Judy Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Purkett et al
as 4:2007cv01251
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Anderson
Defendant:
James Purkett, CMS, Charles Chastain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
