Cases 51 - 59 of 59
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. McDONALD et al
as 4:2012cv00005
Defendant:
LARRY LOWE, SR., WILLIAM LOWE and TERRY McDONALD
Plaintiff:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Guillermo v. McDonald
as 3:2011cv06231
Petitioner:
Celestino Guillermo
Respondent:
Terri McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Boston v. Garcia et al
as 2:2010cv01782
Plaintiff:
Andre' Boston
Defendant:
V. Garcia, B. Alkire, D.J. Renauld and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Centobene v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 10-15269
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES RODNEY CENTOBENE
Defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, State of California, JAMES E. TILTON, Secretary, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, SCOTT KERNAN, Division of Adult Institutions, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations and others
Acero v. McDonald et al
as 3:2008cv01921
Petitioner:
David Escobedo Acero
Respondent:
Terry McDonald, Susan L Hubbard and Edmond G. Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Centobene v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2008cv01795
Plaintiff:
James R Centobene
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, James Tilton, Scott Kernan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Centobene v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 3:2008cv02708
Plaintiff:
James Centobene
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, James Tilton, Scott Kernan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Flying J Incorporated v. City of New Haven, Indiana, et al
as 08-2319
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FLYING J, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF NEW HAVEN, INDIANA, BRIAN YOH, individually and as Plan Director and Zoning Administrator of the City of New Haven, TERRY MCDONALD, individually and as Mayor of the City of New Haven and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
