Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Benedda Cotten, et al v. Ryan Miller, et al
as 22-2872
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Benedda Cotten and Terry Davis
Defendant / Appellant:
Ryan Miller, in their individual capacities and Brian Graupner, in their individual capacities
Davis v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2021cv00838
Plaintiff:
Terry Davis
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Christ et al v. Rogers et al
as 4:2021cv00177
Defendant:
David Clark, Arkansas Department of Human Services, Glen Hoggard and others
Plaintiff:
Tyler Christ and Lisa Christ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cotten et al v. Miller et al
as 0:2020cv01588
Plaintiff:
Benedda Cotten and Terry Davis
Defendant:
Ryan Miller and Brian Graupner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andersen et al v. Central Iowa Carpenters Pension Trust Fund et al
as 4:2017cv00447
Plaintiff:
Robert Andersen , Brent Whitney , Mark Peterson and others
Defendant:
Central Iowa Carpenters Pension Trust Fund, Burt Johnson, Joe Kline and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv02834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ashurst et al v. J.P. Morgan Retirement Plan Services, LLC et al
as 4:2013cv00803
Plaintiff:
Stahr Ashurst , Valerie Arrocha , LeAnn M. Belew and others
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Retirement Plan Services, LLC , JP Morgan Chase & Co. , J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00352
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
