Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Cawthorn v. Circosta et al
as 5:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
Madison Cawthorn
Defendant:
DAMON CIRCOSTA, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHAIRMAN OF THE NC STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, STELLA ANDERSON, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF THE NC BOARD OF ELECTIONS, JEFF CARMON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MEMBER OF THE NC STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Interested Party:
Barbara Lynn Amalfi, Laurel Ashton, Natalie Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. CENTRAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2019cv01038
Plaintiff:
TERRY LEE BROWN
Defendant:
NATIONWIDE AFFINITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, John Doe 1, CENTRAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HATFIELD v. USA
as 1:2019cv00075
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
TERRY LEE HATFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Shinaberry v. Town of Murfreesboro, N.C. et al DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. SEE 2:17-CV-7-F.
as 4:2017cv00033
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Shinaberry
Defendant:
Town of Murfreesboro, N.C., Bobbie J Barmer, Michael P Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Shinaberry v. Town of Murfreesboro, N.C. et al
as 2:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Shinaberry
Defendant:
Town of Murfreesboro, N.C. , Bobbie J Barmer, Michael P Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BETHEA v. USA
as 1:2016cv00606
Petitioner:
TERRY LEE BETHEA
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HATFIELD v. USA
as 1:2015cv00978
Petitioner:
TERRY LEE HATFIELD
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jenkins v. Colvin
as 5:2015cv00010
Plaintiff:
Terri Lee Jenkins
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
REYNOLDS INNOVATIONS INC. v. BURKHEAD et al
as 1:2014cv00508
Plaintiff:
REYNOLDS INNOVATIONS INC.
Defendant:
TERRY LEE BURKHEAD and PREMIUM EJUICE USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Buck v. USA
as 4:2014cv00009
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Terry Lee Buck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
