Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Thomas v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv09713
Plaintiff:
Terry Thomas
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv04821
Plaintiff:
Terri Thomas and Bobby Thomas
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv28275
Plaintiff:
Terri Thomas
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv23557
Plaintiff:
Margie Thomas and Terry Thomas
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv01968
Plaintiff:
Ruby Thomas and Terry Thomas
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowers et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv05522
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Dawn Bowers and Terry Thomas Bowers
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv03843
Plaintiff:
Sandra Thomas and Terry Thomas
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Terry Thomas v. Mary Westfall
as 09-7989
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY WESTFALL, Medical Director for Correctional Medical Services, DAVID MILLER, Physician Assistant, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Thomas v. Westfall et al
as 2:2008cv00126
Plaintiff:
Terry Thomas
Defendant:
Mary Westfall, David Miller, Correctional Medical Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thomas v. Boston Mutual Life Insurance Company
as 2:2007cv00047
Plaintiff:
Terry Thomas
Defendant:
Boston Mutual Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
