Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Raduano et al v. Testa
as 1:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Michelle Raduano and William J. Flynn
Defendant:
Mar-Cia Testa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Aljuaid et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01556
Plaintiff:
Susan Hambric, Kevin Little, Avery Winder and others
Defendant:
Audi of America, LLC, Audi Aktiengesellschaft, Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
514 Broadway Investment Trust v. Rapoza, et al
as 14-1983
Plaintiff - Appellant:
514 BROADWAY INVESTMENT TRUST, UDT DATED 8/22/05, by and through its Trustee, Robert A. Blechman
Defendant - Appellee:
CRAIG F. RAPOZA, BAINBRIDGE REALTY CORP., a/k/a Bainbridge Realty, Inc., PETER P. D'AMICO and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL F. BEHM and HELEN R. COUPE, d/b/a Re/Max Metro
BARKER et al v. HOSTETTER et al
as 2:2013cv05081
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BARKER, KRISTEN BARKER, WILLIAM B. CAREY, III and others
Defendant:
WILMER L. HOSTETTER, JOYCE L. HOSTETTER, KEYSTONE CUSTOM HOMES, INC. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
HUGH V ARCHER INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A MAVICKAR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, MAVICKAR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC., MAVICKAR ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEKAS et al v. WORLD SAVINGS BANK, F.S.B. et al
as 2:2009cv02559
Plaintiff:
NITSA LEKAS and STANLEY LEKAS
Defendant:
WORLD SAVINGS BANK, F.S.B., WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., PROGRESSIVE MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
514 Broadway Investment Trust, UDT Dated 8/22/05 v. Rapoza et al
as 1:2008cv00369
Plaintiff:
514 Broadway Investment Trust, UDT Dated 8/22/05, 514 Broadway Investment Trust, UDT Dated 8/22/05 and 514 Broadway Investment Trust, UDT Dated 8/22/05
Defendant:
Craig F. Rapoza, Bainbridge Realty Corp., Peter P. D'Amico and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
