Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Pierce County, Georgia v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 5:2018cv00068
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Pierce County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
City of Alma, Georgia v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018op45620
Plaintiff:
City of Alma, Georgia
Defendant:
AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-1769
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Candler County, Georgia v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018op45165
Plaintiff:
Candler County, Georgia
Defendant:
AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Candler County Hospital Authority v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018op45167
Plaintiff:
Candler County Hospital Authority
Defendant:
AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Cardnial Health, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv03234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04588
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
