Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Winston v. Texas Juvenile Justice Department et al
as 4:2024cv01053
Defendant:
Mike Combest, Lori Nixon, Felix Valdez and others
Plaintiff:
Nadia Winston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Freelen et al v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2024cv01422
Defendant:
Aaron Pena, Michael Alsobrook, RN Olushola Adebayo and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Keith Beasley, Sr. and Amnisty Mullin Freelen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Bazile et al v. Texas Juvenile Justice Department et al
as 4:2024cv02936
Plaintiff:
A.A. and Cherrie Bazile
Defendant:
Texas Juvenile Justice Department and Leah Shapiro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-40336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Cantu v. Texas Youth Commission-Evins Regional Juvenile Center et al
as 7:2021cv00413
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Cantu
Defendant:
Texas Youth Commission-Evins Regional Juvenile Center, Texas Juvenile Justice Department and Gabe Atsu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodrow Jones, Sr. v. Texas Juvenile Justice Dept
as 17-40488
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WOODROW J. JONES, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS JUVENILE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, Interim Executive Director (David Reilly)
Lewis v. Texas Juvenile Justice Department, et al
as 4:2017cv00161
Plaintiff:
Roy Lewis, Jr
Defendant:
Texas Juvenile Justice Department , Gainesville State School and The State Of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2016cv00600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
