Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Dowdy, Tom v. TextBehind
as 3:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Tom Curtis Dowdy
Defendant:
TextBehind
Not Yet Classified:
GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petty, Daniel v. Mayson et al
as 3:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rhymes Petty
Defendant:
Sgt. Mayson, C.O. D. Johnson, C.O. Kaczmarek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armin Wand, III v. TextBehind
as 24-1076
Plaintiff:
ARMIN WAND, III
Defendant:
TEXTBEHIND, Third-Party Mail Vendor
Titus Henderson v. TextBehind, et al
as 24-1008
Plaintiff:
TITUS HENDERSON
Defendant:
TEXTBEHIND, TEXTBEHIND CEO & COO, WENDI MONFILS and others
Armin Wand, III v. TextBehind
as 23-3402
Plaintiff:
ARMIN WAND, III
Defendant:
TEXTBEHIND, Third-Party Mail Vendor
Henderson, Titus et al v. TextBehind et al
as 3:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Titus Henderson and Ronald Branch
Defendant:
TextBehind, TextBehind CEO & COO, Wendi Monfils and others
Not Classified By Court:
GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker et al v. Monfils et al
as 1:2022cv01392
Plaintiff:
Marcellous L Walker, Armin Wand, III, Jeremy L Wand and others
Defendant:
Gary Boughton, Dane Esser, Wendy Monfils and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker, Marcellous et al v. Boughton, Gary et al
as 3:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
Marcellous Walker, Armin Wand, III, Jeremy Wand and others
Defendant:
Gary Boughton, Dane Esser, Wendy Monfils and others
Not Classified By Court:
WSPF Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. TextBehind
as 5:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel R. Webb
Defendant:
TextBehind
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NUNEZ v. NORRIS et al
as 5:2019cv00408
Defendant:
WARDEN JANINE L. QUIGLEY, MATTHEW CORNELL, DAVID KOPE and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE ENRIQUE NUNEZ, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
