Cases 1 - 8 of 8
BOKOR v. THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2021cv00211
Defendant:
THE AMERICAN ATHLETIC CONFERENCE, THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH and others
Plaintiff:
CRAIG BOKOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DELSARDO v. THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATON et al
as 2:2021cv00213
Defendant:
THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, THE AMERICAN ATHLETIC CONFERENCE, THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DELSARDO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Javon Marshall, et al v. ESPN, et al
as 15-5753
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAVON MARSHALL, STEVEN CLARKE, CHRIS CONNER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ESPN, CBS BROADCASTING, INC., NBC UNIVERSAL INC. and others
Marshall et al v. ESPN Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01945
Plaintiff:
Javon Marshall , Steven Clarke , Chris Conner and others
Defendant:
ESPN Inc. , CBS Broadcasting, Inc. , National Broadcasting Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY v. THE BIG EAST CONFERENCE
as 3:2012cv07898
Plaintiff:
RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY
Defendant:
THE BIG EAST CONFERENCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH OF THE COMMONWEALTH SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION v. THE BIG EAST CONFERENCE
as 2:2012cv00747
Plaintiff:
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH OF THE COMMONWEALTH SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION
Defendant:
THE BIG EAST CONFERENCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Maze et al v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al
as 3:2010cv05569
Plaintiff:
Bobby C. Maze and Jordan Dixon
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association, Collegiate Licensing Company, Electronic Arts, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Glover v. The National Collegiate Athletic Association et al
as 1:2008cv00322
Plaintiff:
Michael Glover and Michael Glover
Defendant:
The National Collegiate Athletic Association and The Big East Conference
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
