Cases 41 - 50 of 304
Kistler et al v. Stanley Black & Decker Inc et al
as 3:2022cv00966
Plaintiff:
Lisa Lang and James Kistler
Defendant:
Stanley Black & Decker Inc, The Board of Trustees of Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., The Administrative Committee of the Stanley Black & Decker Retirement Account Plan and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Benefits Council, ERISA Industry Committee, American Retirement Association and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Bracalente et al v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv04417
Plaintiff:
Robert Bracalente and Boris Gdalevich
Defendant:
Cisco Systems, Inc., The Board of Trustees of Cisco Systems, Inc. and The Administrative Committee of the Cisco Systems, Inc. 401(K) Plan
Amicus Curiae:
American Benefits Council, ERISA Industry Committee, American Retirement Association and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Luckett v. Wintrust Financial Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv03968
Plaintiff:
Lynetta Luckett
Defendant:
Wintrust Financial Corporation, The Board of Trustees of Wintrust Financial Corp., The Administrative Committee of the Wintrust Financial Corp. Retirement Savings Plan and others
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, American Benefits Council, ERISA Industry Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Stephanie Turner v. McDonald's USA LLC, et al
as 22-2334
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHANIE TURNER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
MCDONALD'S USA LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and MCDONALD'S CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO and others
Peter Maldini v. Marriott International, Incorporated
as 22-1745
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PETER MALDINI, ROGER CULLEN, PAULA O'BRIEN and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED
Amicus Curiae:
THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NATIONAL RETAIL FEDERATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CONSUMER ADVOCATES and others
Peter Maldini v. Accenture LLP
as 22-1744
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PETER MALDINI, PAULA O'BRIEN, ROBERT GUZIKOWSKI and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ACCENTURE LLP
Amicus Curiae:
THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NATIONAL RETAIL FEDERATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CONSUMER ADVOCATES and others
EB5 CAPITAL et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 3:2022cv03948
Plaintiff:
EB5 CAPITAL, CANAM ENTERPRISES, LP, CIVITAS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Federal Trade Commission v. Walmart Inc.
as 1:2022cv03372
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
Jennifer L. Mascott, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Retail Litigation Center, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
State of Texas v. Yellen
as 22-10560
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas, State of Mississippi and State of Louisiana
Defendant / Appellant:
Janet Yellen, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury, Richard K. Delmar, in his official capacity as Acting Inspector General of the Department of the Treasury, United States Department of the Treasury and others
Amicus Curiae:
National Taxpayers Union Foundation, Buckeye Institute, New Civil Liberties Alliance and others
Prantil v. Arkema Incorporated
as 22-90030
Respondent:
Corey Prantil, Betty Whatley, Larry Anderson and others
Petitioner:
Arkema Incorporated
Not Classified By Court:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers and American Chemistry Council
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
