Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 99
Alexander v. The City of Syracuse
as 11-361
Plaintiff - Appellant: Troy Alexander
Defendant: The County of Onondaga, Kari A. Armstrong and Teaketa Lewis
Defendant - Appellee: The City of Syracuse and Steven Stonecypher
In Re: Pharmaceutical Industry
as 10-1959
: SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 537 TRUST FUNDS, BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF MASSACHUSETTS and SHEET METAL WORKERS UNION NATIONAL HEALTH FUND
Defendant - Appellant: BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee: GLAXOWELLCOME, INC.
Appellant: DONALD E. HAVILAND, JR.
Forjone v. The State of California
as 10-822
Plaintiff: Wayne Mack, Dan DelPlato, Jr., Gabriel Razzano and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: John-Joseph Forjone, the 42 USC 1983/Bivens/False Claims Act matter effecting the statewide distribution of HAVA funds requiring a 28 USC 2284 panel effecting New York Municipal People's equity in Bottom-up suffrage. Homerule autonomy and effecting real p
Defendant - Appellee: The State of California, each by the Secretary of State and the Attorney General respectively, The State of Oregon, each by the Secretary of State and the Attorney General respectively, The State of New Mexico, each by the Secretary of State and the Attorney General respectively and others
Waldron v. Milana et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv00065
Plaintiff: Debbie M. Waldron
Defendant: James Milana, Scott Henderson, Sean Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gordon et al v. County of Onondaga et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv01182
Plaintiff: Verna Gordon and Verna Gordon
Defendant: County of Onondaga, Onondaga County Sheriff's Department, Town of Clay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Type: Civil Rights None
Washington v. County of Onondaga, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2004cv00997
Plaintiff: Anita Washington
Defendant: Onondaga County Correctional Facility at Jamesville and County of Onondaga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Harmon v. County of Onondaga et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv01050
Plaintiff: Audra A. Harmon
Defendant: County of Onondaga, Onondaga County Sheriff's Department, Kevin Walsh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Joy v. State of New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv00841
Plaintiff: Dwayne Joy
Defendant: State of New York, Brain Fischer, County of Onondaga and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
In Re: Pharmaceutical Case, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1196
: SHIRLEY GELLER, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA, TWIN CITIES BAKERY WORKERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, CARPENTERS & MILLWRI, Carpenters & Millwrights of Houston and Vicinity Welfare Trust Fund, Board of Trustees, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LEROY TOWNSEND, Individually and on behalf of other similarly situated and others
: UNITED STATES, COUNTY OF ULSTER, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: M. JOYCE HOWE
Defendant - Appellant: BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee: GLAXOWELLCOME, INC. and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
Piscitelli v. County of Onondaga et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2008cv01264
Plaintiff: Jennifer Piscitelli
Defendant: County of Onondaga, Onondaga County Department of Social Services and David Sutkowy
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?