Cases 31 - 40 of 293
Kempa v. United Services Automobile Association
as 2:2022cv12614
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW KEMPA
Cross Claimant:
United Services Automobile Association
Cross Defendant:
ESSENTIAL SPINE INTERVENTIONS, PLLC, Alliance Anesthesia, PLLC, CHESTERFIELD FAMILY CHIROPRACTIC and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3836
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3837
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv11972
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hobson v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Ronald Howard Hobson
Defendant:
United States of America, US Department of Justice, US Department of Veterans Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Skrettas v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 5:2022cv11439
Plaintiff:
George Dimitrios Skrettas
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and Denis McDonough
West v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 3:2022cv00302
Plaintiff:
Angela West
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Administration, Louisville Veterans Administration Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Poulos v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
as 5:2022cv00860
Plaintiff:
George Poulos
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BIRCH LEVEN ENGINEERING INC v. Department of Veterans Affairs
as 2:2022cv10616
Plaintiff:
BIRCH LEVEN ENGINEERING INC
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
