Cases 21 - 30 of 104
INGRAM v. THE HOME DEPOT, INC.
as 1:2017cv04011
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL INGRAM
Defendant:
THE HOME DEPOT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
Thayer v. Home Depot Inc.
as 1:2017cv00814
Plaintiff:
Zachary Thayer
Defendant:
Home Depot Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chang v. SFS Depot Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01369
Plaintiff:
Qun Feng Chang
Defendant:
Jing Mei Design Group Inc., "John" (First Name Unknown) Lin, Long G. Lin and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Chang v. SFS Depot Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01369
Plaintiff:
Qun Feng Chang
Defendant:
Jing Mei Design Group Inc., "John" (First Name Unknown) Lin, Long G. Lin and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Whitcomb v. Home Depot, Inc
as 3:2017cv01246
Plaintiff:
David Whitcomb
Defendant:
Home Depot, Inc
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Hecht v. Office Depot, Inc.
as 1:2016cv04787
Plaintiff:
Adam Hecht
Defendant:
Office Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Flores v. Home Furnishings Depot, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv06573
Defendant:
Moshe Cohen, Moshe Elul and Home Furnishings Depot, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Martimiano Flores
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
UFCW Local 50 Pension Fund et al v. Food Depot, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06197
Defendant:
Food Depot, Inc. and John Doe Company
Plaintiff:
Larry Magarik and UFCW Local 50 Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Karl Dang, et al v. Inspection Depot, Inc., et al
as 16-15153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KARL DANG, and other similarly situated individuals and JOANNE DULWICK
Defendant - Appellee:
INSPECTION DEPOT, INC., a Florida corporation and MICHAEL ROWAN, Individually
:
CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION
Williamson v. Home Depot, Inc.
as 6:2016cv01179
Plaintiff:
Troy Williamson
Defendant:
Home Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
