Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Faine et al v. Zep, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05729
Plaintiff:
Frank DeVito, Vernon Faine, Helen DeVito and others
Defendant:
Zep, Inc. and Dow Chemical Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lydon, et al v The Dow Chemical CO.,et.al.
as 1:2013cv11932
Plaintiff:
Carol Lydon , James Lydon , S. L. and others
Defendant:
The Dow Chemical Co. and Home Depot U.S.A. , Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Leonard Broussard, et al v. TMR Company
as 13-30042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEONARD BROUSSARD and BERTHA THIBODEAUX
Defendant - Appellee:
DOW CHEMICAL CO
Broussard et al v. T M R Co et al
as 2:2011cv01446
Plaintiff:
Leonard Broussard and Bertha Thibodeaux
Defendant:
Chevron U S A Inc , Chevron U S A Holdings Inc , Four Star Oil & Gas Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Broussard et al v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. as Successor to Getty Oil Company and Tidewater Oil Company et al
as 2:2011cv01444
Plaintiff:
Leonard Broussard and Bertha Thibodeaux
Defendant:
Chevron U S A Inc, Four Star Oil & Gas Co, Chevron U S A Holdings Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Broussard et al v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. as Successor to Getty Oil Company and Tidewater Oil Company et al
as 2:2011cv01442
Plaintiff:
Leonard Broussard and Bertha Thibodeaux
Defendant:
Chevron U S A Inc, Four Star Oil & Gas Co, Chevron U S A Holdings Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Comer et al v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00220
Defendant:
Southern California Edison Company, AEP Texas Central Company, Ameren Illinois Company and others
Plaintiff:
Johanna Kisielewski, All Plaintiffs, Eric Haygood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC et al
as 2:2009cv70056
Plaintiff:
RONALD W JOHNSON
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC, ACANDS, INC, ACANDS, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
