Cases 1 - 10 of 14
CARRINGTON v. SHARF et al
as 1:2022cv00424
Plaintiff:
THEODORE MACON CARRINGTON, JR.
Defendant:
DR. A. SHARF, DR. STRIBLING RILEY, FBOP (FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DECORY v. ANDERSON et al
as 1:2022cv00260
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MARTIN ARDENE DECORY
Defendant:
D. ANDERSON, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARRINGTON v. ROSS et al
as 1:2021cv00350
Defendant:
BUTNER FCI FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and DR. HEATHER ROSS
Plaintiff:
THEODORE MACON CARRINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COOPER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2020cv00704
Plaintiff:
DARRYLE JERMAINE COOPER
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HILL v. SMITH et al
as 1:2018cv00346
Plaintiff:
DAVID ALAN HILL
Defendant:
DONNA SMITH, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS OF U.S.A., CARLA SPAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CORNELL v. USA, et al.,
as 1:2017cv00878
Petitioner:
LEWIS THOMAS CORNELL
Respondent:
USA and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROGERS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2016cv00934
Plaintiff:
HARVEY ROGERS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WILDER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2011cv00649
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE VERLIN WILDER, SR.
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER - BUTNER and UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANTORO v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, ET AL.,
as 1:2011cv00537
Plaintiff:
MARIO FERNANDO SANTORO
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FMC BUTNER, HARLEY G. LAPPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
POWERS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS/FEDERAL PRISON CAMP et al
as 1:2010cv00838
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE R. POWERS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS/FEDERAL PRISON CAMP, NATALIE WRIGHT and MCMICHEAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
