Cases 41 - 50 of 178
Pedreira v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2018cv12535
Defendant:
Mr. Garny, Dr. Kennedy, Mr. Benard and others
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Pedreira, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Yannai v. Department of Justice United States et al
as 4:2018cv40173
Defendant:
Administrative Remedy Coordinator, Central Office, Anthony Amico, Administrative Remedy Coordinator, Northeast Regional Office and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Yannai
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv40174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Lopez-Pastrana v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2018cv01310
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Lopez-Pastrana
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Warner v. Spaulding et al
as 1:2018cv10850
Petitioner:
Luke Jospeh Warner
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding, Berhan Yeh, Federal Medical Center Devens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sinkfield v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2018cv10223
Plaintiff:
Maurice Sinkfield
Defendant:
United States of America and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Miranda v. United States of America, et al.
as 3:2018cv01037
Plaintiff:
Jose' E. Lopez Miranda
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robinson v. USA et al
as 1:2017fp00385
Defendant:
Marylin Angud, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Ruben B. Morales and others
Plaintiff:
William Ulyssess Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lipscomb v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2017cv40128
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lipscomb
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Medical Center Devens, Yeh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cipriano v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2017cv00377
Petitioner:
Norman Cipriano
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
