Cases 1 - 10 of 1,261
Texas Assoc of Bcasts v. FCC
as 24-60226
Petitioner:
Texas Association of Broadcasters
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
AT&T, Incorporated v. FCC
as 24-60223
Petitioner:
AT&T, Incorporated
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
National Relig Broadcasters v. FCC
as 24-60219
Petitioner:
National Religious Broadcasters and American Family Association
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Story v. Federal Communications Commissions
as 1:2024cv00625
Plaintiff:
Michael Brandon Story
Defendant:
Federal Communications Commissions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Indian Peak Properties LLC v. FCC, et al
as 24-1108
Petitioner:
Indian Peak Properties LLC
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Peerless Network, Inc. v. FCC
as 24-1777
Petitioner:
PEERLESS NETWORK, INC.
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Janczuk v. United States of America (USA) et al
as 1:2024cv03260
Plaintiff:
Weronika Janczuk
Defendant:
United States of America (USA) and Federal Communications Commissions (FCC)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Howell v. Department of Justice, et al
as 24-1374
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Janczuk v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv02749
Plaintiff:
Weronika E. Janczuk
Defendant:
United States of America and Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Consumers' Research v. FCC
as 24-60160
Petitioner:
Consumers' Research, Cause Based Commerce, Incorporated, Edward J. Blum and others
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
